all my march 21st posts. too bad today's not the 22nd because i have posts for the 22nd back to 2001. sigh.
my post from march 21, 2005:
tell me i'm losing my mind! i had the worst nightmare last night. i dreamt that both my mom and my sister were shooting up heroin and were addicts. it was the weirdest thing. i woke up at like 6 am. but wanted to go back to sleep to find out what happened. oy.
my posts from march 21, 2004:
2:13 am March 21st, 2004
so i spent my spring accomplishing little. one thing i did do was to watch a lot of crap teevee on my computer. sigh. but it's weird, a WHOLE LOT of these new shows are obsessed with the supernatural. e.g. tru calling, joan of arcadia, wonderfalls, kingdom hospital, etc. i wonder why that is? is this a new genre ? did this come about because of deeper current societal obsessions? or is it simply that the networks just all copy from each other? eh. but tonight, i was hoping to catch episode two of century city to see if it got any better or if it was just as bad and hilariously so like last time. but it got preempted by basketball. oh well. and poor stanford lost! all that expectation... sigh. i'm turning into crazy teevee watcher. good thing spring break is over and my life is over since the count down to finals is less than 5 weeks. bah!
Leave a comment
12:59 am March 21st, 2004
i was reading 'bout the taiwan elections and this random bit on the side caught my eye. the world is a bizarre place i tell ya.http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/bristol/somerset/3554121.stm
A lesbian university student who auctioned her virginity on the internet to pay for her studies is reported to have had sex with the highest bidder.
3 comments or Leave a comment
01:45 pm March 21st, 2004
the problem with owning really really sharp knives.
while making guacamole, i stabbed my knife into my finger. now i can't type with both hands. ack. i almost fainted 'cause i was so freaked out. what am i gonna do tomorrow? take notes by hand??? boo.
2 comments or Leave a comment
03:01 pm March 21st, 2004
the washington post is so not exciting. they turn what could have been interesting into something not. can't really put my finger on it quite yet. but i think my friend is right, there are some strange underlying assumptions of the writer that makes the article seem somewhat wrong - pulitzer or not. the four or five historical references are all taken out of context. i don't like.
( Read more... )
Leave a comment
05:48 pm March 21st, 2004
5 comments or Leave a comment